What’s really going on in the market right now?

As a Senior Recruitment Consultant, I speak to hiring managers and candidates every day. Not just occasionally. Not from behind a desk reading a report. I’m having real conversations. I’m hearing what managers are struggling with, what candidates are worried about, where businesses are trying to allocate their budgets and where the two sides fail to meet in the middle.

The consensus is clear: the Australian hiring market in 2026 looks completely different depending on where you're sitting

So, what’s actually happening in the market?

Plenty of reports and social posts tell us what the market looks like on paper. Yes, I read them too. But stats don’t show what it feels like to sit in front of a laptop applying for your 40th job.

They don’t show the manager overwhelmed by hundreds of applications, or the candidate asking me, “Is my level of seniority working against me? Will they assume my years of experience mean I’m no longer adaptable?”

They don’t capture the person wondering if they should take a big pay cut just to get back to work.

That’s why I wrote this. This isn't another market report. It's what I see and hear every day.

Why are companies hiring differently in 2026?

One of the biggest shifts I see is the move away from standard permanent roles.

I’m seeing far more fixed-term contracts, project work, and businesses getting creative with budgets. It feels like companies are testing the waters. They might not have approval for a permanent role, but they still have a problem to solve. So, they tap into a project budget, bring someone in for six months, or try a different hiring model entirely.

The problem? Candidates are hesitant.

In a market where job security feels low, asking someone to leave a permanent role for a six-month contract is a tough sell. This creates a bottleneck: businesses want flexibility, candidates want security, and both sides are trying to figure out how much risk they can take.

Is age really the issue, or is adaptability the real test?

I recently saw an article titled “How to Botox Your Resume.” The idea was to remove everything except the last 10 years of your career to make your CV feel modern.

I had mixed feelings about it. I love when someone puts effort into their resume; a clean CV that highlights recent wins and shows your value is great. But are we really moving toward a market where people feel they must hide their past to avoid ageism?

That doesn't sit well with me. The conversation shouldn't just be about age. It should be about adaptability. I've met people early in their careers who are set in their ways, and I've met people with decades of experience who are the most curious, forward-thinking people in the room. The barrier isn't age. The barrier is being unwilling to learn.

Tenure used to be everything, and experience still matters. But the focus has shifted.

Now hiring managers ask:

• What tools have you used recently?
• How have you modernised your approach?
• How do you view AI?
• Can you adapt and learn when the market changes?

To me, that’s a far better conversation than simply counting years worked.

Should you chase the hottest new skill, or build on what you've got?

Every week, another designer asks: “What skill should I be learning right now?”

I get it. The market moves fast, AI is everywhere, and job titles shift constantly. But too many people are abandoning what they’re already great at to chase the shiny new thing.

Lately, I’ve spoken to designers who feel pressured to learn to code. Will it make you more employable? Maybe. But your real value might be your ability to understand a customer, solve complex problems, lead a team, or build a seamless product experience.

You don't need to reinvent yourself every six months.

“Stop chasing the “hot skill” and start skill stacking.”

Figure out what you’re naturally great at, then layer new tools and skills on top of it. Don’t lose your core value while chasing the trend of the week.

Why have job titles become so hard to search for?

Job titles are becoming a nightmare. I see titles like Integration Systems Manager or Operations AI Flow Coordinator roles that didn't even exist a few years ago.

This creates a real issue for both sides. It used to be simple: you searched for “Test Analyst” and found a clear pool of talent. Today, you might see Automation Test Engineer, Quality Engineer or QA Specialist. They all have overlapping skills.

This is why human-led recruitment matters more than ever. Someone needs to cut through the noise, look past the title, and see what a candidate has actually done, what problems they’ve solved, and whether those skills transfer.

The title might not match, but the skill set does.

What does your salary actually reflect now?

This part might be tough to hear, but it's the reality of the market right now: your title alone doesn't set your salary anymore.

Does “Director” automatically mean a Director salary? Not as much as it used to. Leaner teams have changed what senior titles actually mean day-to-day.

What actually determines your value? What you deliver, the tools you understand hands-on, and how adaptable you are—not where you sit on an org chart.

Does this mean you should undersell yourself? No. But it does mean being realistic. Your past salary isn't a guarantee of your next one. Taking a step sideways, a new title or adjusted pay expectations might be what gets you back in. I don't say that lightly — I know there are real mortgages and real lives behind these choices. But ignoring the market won't change it.

Where does AI actually fit into the picture?

There is a huge conversation around AI and how teams operate. I see companies fundamentally rethinking how work gets done. Some offshore, some bring in AI, some do both. Sometimes I worry AI is just an excuse to cut or offshore a team without a long-term plan.

We need to be careful here. Businesses are still built by people.

You can have the best technology in the world, but without the right people asking smart questions, pushing ideas, and working together, you will struggle.

The value of people hasn't vanished; the way we measure it has just changed.

What should candidates and hiring managers do next?

• For candidates: Flexibility is key. I don't mean where you log in from, but flexibility in your skills, your mindset and your drive to learn.
• For hiring managers: We need to get better at looking past titles, buzzwords and rigid career paths.
• For both: Stop looking for the “perfect” match on paper and start looking at core skills, capability and behaviours.

The market moves fast, but the answer isn't to panic, reinvent everything, or pretend your past career didn't happen. Stay curious. Understand where your skills fit. Be willing to learn.

• To the hiring managers: Are you seeing this same disconnect between what you need and what candidates expect?
• To the candidates: Have you felt forced to adapt your title, strategy or pay expectations recently?

I didn’t write this article simply to share my findings and walk away. I want to kick off an ongoing, open dialogue. Your input and questions are invaluable, so please don't hesitate to connect with me on LinkedIn or drop me an email at [email protected]. I’d love to hear your take on today's market.

Job Seeker (153)
Hiring Insights (60)
Thought Leadership (95)
Industry Trends (41)